- 註冊時間
- 2023-5-6
- 精華
- 在線時間
- 小時
- 米币
-
- 最後登錄
- 1970-1-1
累計簽到:5 天 連續簽到:1 天
|
發表於 2025-1-4 02:48:33
|
顯示全部樓層
Mohamed El Kholy , Rasha Tarif Hamza * , Mohamed Saleh and Heba Elsedfy
# a' G" Z4 A. r0 D# K$ F$ u- WPenile length and genital anomalies in Egyptian0 i3 o1 U" f0 s4 U! S% r0 I$ i
male newborns: epidemiology and influence of' Q8 Z: z* A/ U/ ]
endocrine disruptors
7 ^ g2 Q9 n9 K4 d6 LAbstract: This is an attempt to establish the normal
: f- v4 P0 Y& z7 ]stretched penile length and prevalence of male geni-
9 w1 I) m+ U% V1 p) {% btal anomalies in full-term neonates and whether they
+ V$ ^+ M) Y# |! C" y. ?) uare influenced by prenatal parental exposure to endo-4 l9 g* t# R6 N
crine-disrupting chemicals. A thousand newborns were9 p m8 Z: G" u' l* f/ F
included; their mothers were subjected to the following
8 o2 s e5 H2 [/ w1 E+ Hquestionnaire: parents ’ age, residence, occupation, con-3 P% U2 E+ h0 ~# w) l
tact with insecticides and pesticides, antenatal exposure
& b [$ g# p; M" R) w& x* d% q' Bto cigarette smoke or drugs, family history of genital
- p$ V3 R( {8 R3 Q, |anomalies, phytoestrogens intake and history of in vitro) H5 C* b/ M5 ~ t; @4 F$ F x
fertilization or infertility. Free testosterone was measured
; @9 d( |/ W6 r7 d$ V# pin 150 neonates in the first day of life. Mean penile length
; P& ^! M+ @& vwas 3.4 ± 0.37 cm. A penile length < 2.5 cm was considered
0 C, D9 P& K- q0 vmicropenis. Prevalence of genital anomalies was 1.8 %) d7 E1 R) [5 _" A& Z3 O3 z: q
(hypospadias 83.33 % ). There was a higher rate of anoma-# O3 _( K v: O z2 u9 a; v
lies in those exposed to endocrine disruptors (EDs; 7.4 % )
! M; b6 Y( W: U0 B& v* Fthan in the non-exposed (1.2 % ; p < 0.0001; odds ratio 6,
6 @- \6 X2 }* V2 b5 I* _8 {' R95 % confidence interval 2 – 16). Mean penile length showed
/ h, u$ v# }+ @: Z* p8 s5 `a linear relationship with free testosterone and was lower8 V% \3 V7 J; A* @
in neonates exposed to EDs.
5 t% k: y0 }; hKeywords: endocrine disruptors; genital anomalies; male;$ p( K# b9 W% I: ~- f
penile length; testosterone.
8 E# u0 K9 r% W' _+ r- E I*Corresponding author : Rasha Tarif Hamza, MD, Faculty of, ?9 B4 g5 |% K4 F y
Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Ain Shams University, 36
7 B2 t* _0 r2 j X2 }Hisham Labib Street, off Makram Ebeid Street, Nasr City, Cairo
& v5 a# j( a# T2 c2 d/ q$ |11371, Cairo, Egypt, Phone: + 20-2-22734727, Fax: + 20-2-26904430 ,
( [3 ]7 U+ I: p5 n! JE-mail: [email protected]% d$ n$ e; W2 w6 {& d+ ?! a
Mohamed El Kholy, Mohamed Saleh and Heba Elsedfy: Faculty of
% M G' G h0 D: \5 WMedicine , Department of Pediatrics, Ain Shams University, Cairo,, t0 r2 Z* t3 D! H l2 I
Egypt1 O7 B3 D" X: l$ w# Q) m5 Q
Introduction* ]! G4 @0 B, f
Determination of penile size is employed clinically in+ e9 W5 D8 D, W% ~' e+ ]2 ]: @ ?
the evaluation of children with abnormal genital devel-
( {( Y; b/ T$ Zopment, such as, for example, micropenis, defined as a
2 {) T7 j# k3 G3 ^penis that is normal in terms of shape and function, but is+ U) F( e/ J7 [. a- p
more than 2.5 standard deviations (SD) smaller than mean7 @7 _7 Y! p, E2 L9 D; N' D
size in terms of length (1) . However, these measurements( N" ~5 G3 \/ ^+ y
can be subject to significant international variations, in
5 S4 ~0 @) P/ a$ u& o. [6 E# j5 Daddition to being obtained with different methodologies
, m+ F d9 Y# B- A+ x* Y9 }in some cases (2) .
! I' t0 O) Y5 U: p0 qOver the past 20 years, the documented increase in
* b. h6 o" u& D5 f, |disorders of male sexual differentiation, such as hypo-
# {8 p. G m2 L2 B8 x# hspadias, cryptorchidism, and micropenis, has led to the2 _* \8 H! b# n G' q: n6 j
suspicion that environmental chemicals are detrimental
. S. I% ~# o/ B. V* U1 \to normal male genital development in utero (3) . The so-
8 U1 x8 l( b! h6 H) J# Mcalled Sharpe-Skakkebaek hypothesis offered a possible! z+ P7 ^# B: s0 G* ?
common cause and toxicological mechanism for abnor-: e3 I! a; l& t* Q0 a2 I- u8 D8 J
malities in men and boys – that is, increased exposure to
# W X5 h# Y0 D* S: f+ Q. Y3 T" A/ Coestrogen in utero may interfere with the multiplication/ M9 E5 r& _' c% H r9 k7 M
of fetal Sertoli cells, resulting in hormonally mediated' N8 a2 y- @- E$ ?/ Y
developmental effects and, after puberty, reduced quality" _- K3 g! N8 D" V$ K" ]0 H& c
of semen (4) .
2 r `$ V3 ^ ]5 XIt has been proposed that these disorders are part of- I0 C% c+ I, }7 t# t( I+ e0 ]
a single common underlying entity known as the testicu-7 s, |/ s$ F# K
lar dysgenesis syndrome (TDS) (5) . TDS comprises various
, } J) a, Z' [aspects of impaired gonadal development and function,
- Y- |; x! C; }8 v$ u4 Wincluding abnormal spermatogenesis, cryptorchidism,
& ~6 G s' q8 U- q6 t. ]hypospadias, and testicular cancer (6) .& d, I! N8 B* |7 z% g
The etiological basis for this condition is complex
5 S6 C- }) ^5 j3 d) T3 Dand is thought to be due to a combination of both genetic
c$ P7 k- S; F% M$ dand environmental factors that result in the disruption
) @% Z. H# ]# }, k' Oof normal gonadal development during fetal life. First,
3 m, B0 D; M4 C _9 Nit was proposed that environmental chemicals with oes-
& Z; G/ O; s7 _: k& E2 etrogen-like actions could have adverse effects on male
& S4 V4 i1 q/ q/ O1 Qgonadal development. This has since been expanded to
7 _$ H; B$ B7 U5 Sinclude environmental chemicals with anti-androgen
% J U" J9 y! Gactions and it is now thought that an imbalance between4 g& C; S6 `% D! ]+ L( ~& @' {8 @! O
androgen and oestrogen activity is the key mechanism by
; I6 b$ `* ` @( m" ^0 n( c4 ^which exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs)
1 y3 k/ O+ J3 r2 @# L8 mresults in the development of TDS and male reproductive
2 ]/ K3 N) h! {( Y. d J9 stract abnormalities (5) .
) A( L8 g7 \4 e! O0 RWith the increasing use of environmental chemicals,
/ f* W- n" H% A5 r$ f% W& Jan attempt was made to establish the normal stretched
$ {/ u8 b9 `5 J( `- ~ dpenile length as well as the prevalence of male genital
7 S/ K: I) T' @% y3 _+ Ianomalies in full-term neonates and whether there is an( S- S4 z* h+ c
influence of prenatal parental exposure to potential EDCs! E2 ]1 K9 u+ x/ F, l3 K7 x
on these parameters.
: M$ P, L. w9 p, e' @5 P' RBrought to you by | University of California - San Francisco
8 |1 U) U! u5 B( F& N* |Authenticated
+ e& ~9 E$ Y* ADownload Date | 2/18/15 4:26 AM4 S9 A5 `, N. A3 y) E& t: {! a2 H
510 El Kholy et al.: Penile length and male genital anomalies
( y) ~5 I. k5 F8 t$ \* O; n0 N1 GSubjects and methods
' e! Q* e% \2 p1 p( zStudy population$ t/ h/ v- t7 s9 p. k2 A% l& ]
The study was conducted as a prospective cohort study at the Univer-- Z3 h: g* i; p _7 j
sity Hospital of Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. A sample of 1000* G! F3 X3 G; G& Z5 J: }
male full-term newborns was studied.
+ R2 f2 S: a. c2 W8 W3 ]Sampling technique
9 v; F7 b: T6 w5 fThree days per week were selected randomly out of 7 days. In each
. ^; r" B* X4 eday, all male full-term deliveries were selected during the time of fi eld+ [- S# N" a* S
study (12 h) during the period from March 2007 to November 2007.
& M% k0 C( B% ]4 {0 f' m( OStatistical analysis
0 }: S# e q; HThe computer program SPSS for Windows release 11.0 (SPSS Inc.,
; k2 n) l" v, ], y5 A" u. a* ~6 A" WChicago, IL, USA) was used for data entry and analysis. All numeric
+ l r+ h8 e& |; W5 i/ ?variables were expressed as mean ± SD. Comparison of diff erent vari-4 h: n1 V+ l4 n
ables between two groups was done using the Student ’ s t-test for3 O3 |, W6 U9 h$ J' t0 y
normally distributed variables. Comparisons of multiple groups were
0 L0 e; A6 y; x4 I$ }done using analysis of variance and post hoc tests for normally dis-
1 f. e; A p% `5 g( xtributed variables. The χ 2 -test was used to compare the frequency of
# N" i# A/ B3 s$ r+ f# _: J6 }qualitative variables among the diff erent groups; the Fisher exact test8 A; d) N8 _, ~# l1 U
was performed in tables containing values < 5. The Pearson correla-
) g) F$ ^3 C+ J, u6 G& ~" C8 z3 ition test was used for correlating various variables. For all tests, a5 M8 g+ S& R" i+ J
probability (p) < 0.05 was considered signifi cant (10) .: {- n: ?0 K, Q+ q$ j/ o4 A
Results
3 V) r' f! e4 P; S6 p# G4 r& DData collected
& p" x0 q7 w0 Z6 kA researcher completed a structured questionnaire during inter-
: X8 }# O" N. K' z: d7 Kviews with the mothers. The questionnaire gathered information* x3 v- g* m6 ^& z$ |' _1 ?& o1 G
on the following: age of parents; residence; occupation of the7 h% U) F* d2 H$ x3 }# j
parents; contact with insecticides and pesticides and their type and1 D6 \ M1 i' k
frequency of contact; maternal exposure to cigarette smoke during( ~# N# E! l0 w+ P
pregnancy; maternal drug history during gestation; family history
& d8 w# w9 E4 D4 bof hypospadias, cryptorchidism, or other congenital anomalies; in-$ M: u6 y; S& S. J1 x
take of foods containing phytoestrogens, e.g., soy beans, olive oil,6 E1 X0 e$ }, e3 d+ h
garlic, hummus, sesame seed, and their frequency; and, also, his-
: v [% Z) T5 Z5 K( u2 p+ F- _$ otory of in vitro fertilization or infertility (type of infertility and drugs! v$ }- @. M A! o
given).9 f z3 I) T7 b2 B
Environmental exposure to chemicals was evaluated for its po-7 w+ K: `+ V3 t
tential of causing endocrine disruption. Chemicals were classifi ed
* U+ u/ D' m5 w6 k8 O, ~into two groups on the basis of scientifi c evidence for their having
) P `2 e2 g0 L4 eendocrine-disrupting properties: group I: evidence of endocrine dis-
5 u% j4 a4 M+ K& Z# gruption high and medium exposure concern; group II: no evidence of
' S9 W. i3 j2 aendocrine disruption and low exposure concern (7) .3 V4 l9 h# }( N* i8 y
Descriptive data
1 E& z d' i3 T) y/ [3 eThe mean age of newborns ’ fathers was 36 ± 6 years (range
0 \" V% B7 K( p6 ` L/ C2 a1 V20 – 50 years) and that of mothers was 26 ± 5 years (range$ a) R, d/ I Y1 }# f
19 – 42 years). Exposure to EDs started long before preg-4 o! _% t0 w! c( @( \- Y
nancy and continued throughout pregnancy. Regard-
3 p0 w0 L, {! h6 O5 _ing therapeutic history during pregnancy, 99 mothers
7 P- K9 j, a" w, ^# z* E(9.9 % ) received progestins, 14 (1.4 % ) received insulin,6 ~ `0 F$ ~0 | x% I: e
6 (0.6 % ) received heparin, 4 (0.04 % ) received long-4 ?" K4 s5 t ]0 Y
acting penicillin, 3 (0.3 % ) received aspirin, 2 (0.2 % )7 Z( t1 u8 c; i$ k( A# `7 W+ {
received B2 agonist, and 1 (0.1 % ) received thyroxin,
2 {8 _+ f/ d# |% Y: b; \while the rest did not receive any medications during3 a5 B8 i% p6 [
pregnancy except for the known multivitamins and
& H1 s$ V& [2 x" Acalcium supplementations. In addition, family history* b+ }' v5 _7 l- y0 U% v0 g0 r
of newborns born small for gestational age was positive& l+ X! M2 K" c' }8 L
in 21 cases (2.1 % ).* o! ^: K$ R0 g! ]0 i
Examination
& Q7 c# d4 F' j' `In addition to the full examination by the paediatric staff , each boy- o7 u5 M1 j7 T
was examined for anomalies of the external genitalia during the, y. X4 X, x$ I; u0 j( f
fi rst 24 h of life by one specially trained researcher. Examination# T! y% @2 b: W9 P) o# z
of the genital system included measurement of stretched penile ?6 T) e% y: G _; O+ E$ X' {
length (8) and examination of external genitalia for congenital
% Y' h8 H5 K, P6 U+ ~" r+ panomalies such as cryptorchidism (9) and hypospadias. Hypospa-
, r4 f" D4 v0 |3 C" E+ J& M8 I* pdias was graded as not glanular, coronal, penile, penoscrotal, scro-5 Y, q. e2 i. f! w! S6 k0 a
tal, or perineal according to the anatomical position. Cases of iso-' \3 U0 U/ l# R
lated malformed foreskin without hypospadias were not included$ {. G0 V1 i" Z% S K3 m3 u* h5 x5 B' S
as cases.
8 `& P3 c% }+ m+ pPenile length$ C3 `, C! A; y% T0 c3 t2 i0 j u6 S
Laboratory investigations9 ~3 A& }: o% d- j
Free testosterone level was measured in 150 randomly chosen neo-
5 @0 \+ P) N' Q9 Qnates from the studied sample in the fi rst day of life (enzyme im-
6 [& ]% a& M; R# x$ D2 ymunoassay test supplied by Diagnostics Biochem Canada, Inc.,
! g* d* r- {* Y* yDorchester, Ontario, Canada).7 A0 _) x9 a; w+ Q6 l- `
Mean penile length was 3.41 ± 0.37 cm (range 2.4 – 4.6 cm).
3 |8 K+ z% p% c! q7 TA penile length < 2.5 cm was considered micropenis ( < the
2 M [1 ]& f. o' s+ O- Y/ ?mean by 2.5 SD). Two cases (0.2 % ) were considered to
- `$ ~) m. o6 |1 B0 | S4 lhave micropenis. Mean penile length was lower (p = 0.041)4 O' f) y' {0 Z) ?8 v
in neonates exposed to EDs (n = 81, 3.1 cm) compared to the
, C) }- N- s% Y$ T+ o8 O& W: a& Hnon-exposed group (n = 919, 3.4 cm; Figure 1 ).8 B s: I& V2 v" ~3 V
There was a linear relationship between penile length
2 x* c* t" }, @! ?9 J5 A0 h5 K3 a# ~and the length of the newborn with a regression coef-
9 S9 A: [6 y, e2 Oficient of 0.05 (95 % CI 0.04 – 0.06; p < 0.0001), i.e., there# F% F* P+ d. M7 \+ a
was an increase of 0.05 cm for each unit increase in length
# U$ E \' {5 J; Q9 e(cm). Similarly, there was a linear relationship between/ P) n _$ h7 L$ m7 o% P6 N. L; \
penile length and the weight of the newborn with a regres-+ {9 b$ t1 {3 ?6 A
sion coefficient of 0.14 (95 % CI 0.09 – 0.18; p < 0.0001), i.e.,$ Z6 x( K% z% [6 e6 R& w) l
there was an increase of 0.14 cm for each unit increase in- B8 n# h; \, B
weight (kg). I* C* l3 M! Y+ H; a
Brought to you by | University of California - San Francisco% p% I. b0 h9 A) B0 z5 H
Authenticated- Z {6 z4 }( f2 X# D
Download Date | 2/18/15 4:26 AM
0 i; v6 Z; l, b9 A1 `El Kholy et al.: Penile length and male genital anomalies 511
6 [' o3 c/ R d" t6 W$ z% d3.45
1 }2 q% @ ^! l9 H6 c3.409 e% y' G8 e& j% v
3.35
6 N& o, F$ j, N3.30( y6 d* s" U2 X; M* |
3.25
3 z4 n$ `5 O3 {3.20
2 O. P- g1 U- u# a' S! Z3.151 I9 _. U: a, b3 ^1 q9 X
3.10/ w% t5 D' X p6 I5 @1 Z0 A
3.05/ K! F3 ?# D6 g0 T: ^4 }
3.00
- x# E {% L0 A) I/ |& u! O! o# g: Q2.953 G0 T, o( f( q2 T1 J( _
2.905 t2 |, I3 v l7 h) V
Mean4 j- [; i# X/ S; Y" d5 O
penile
( @' C2 L* a1 r4 `length
]" `+ j- z1 q, j+ fan odds ratio of 6 (95 % CI 2 – 16), i.e., the exposed persons1 k b/ x$ H F
were six times more likely to develop anomalies than
# m3 T3 t; y/ ]8 l0 i# [- pthose not exposed (Table 1 )., P# f7 e2 K3 E7 d8 n1 H) r% A
Genital anomalies were detected in the offspring
2 I$ m# J; X* _( S5 W: `8 K& [( K. sof those exposed to chlorinated hydrocarbons (9.52 % ),0 I" m; X2 r1 r# y( [2 E. K2 p
phthalate esters (8.70 % ), and heavy metals (6.25 % ). In7 K7 l j5 c; |" Z
contrast, none of the newborns exposed to phenols had/ \' {; |4 w3 L# i
genital anomalies (Table 2 ).7 W2 r L- K. h: @7 ^; I0 C
Exposed$ F( G& y3 l+ o7 k9 A
Non exposed; T" [; M' g& y7 R$ p
Penile lengths according to exposure to endocrine' W0 { X* ?- {9 x
Figure 1 disruptors.# h& h3 u" ^ a4 a
Serum free testosterone levels
3 D" t6 r$ Q, D yExposure to cigarette smoke and progestins* B# j7 ^7 d2 k7 N: l
during the first trimester) Q# S% y3 i: |; X7 \
None of the mothers in the study was an active smoker;
* Q1 s& `4 B( ~: p# v350 were only exposed through passive smoking. There3 b# x" r$ m# e) j& f. C% D7 \
was no difference between rates of anomalies among! @9 B# }. V8 s8 ~7 V& i# g& b
those exposed to cigarette smoke when compared to those
5 v7 v) I2 S- P! jnot exposed (1.1 % vs. 2.2 % ). Similarly, there was no differ-
. g& y( U6 z" x3 mence between the rates of anomalies among those exposed
( W- k. c j" a3 U( Q% p$ zto progestins during the first trimester when compared to
* b# a& I8 l& s) \the non-exposed ones (2 % vs. 1.8 % ).
# D d& r' s4 T- F, D- aIn the first day of life, serum free testosterone levels
# z1 {: H0 n* E7 tranged between 7.2 and 151 pg/mL (mean 61.9 ± 38.4 pg/mL;1 x- A: O( t( @! J9 B
median 60 pg/mL). There was a linear relationship
- W8 M: D% G+ l ]0 }7 Hbetween penile length and testosterone level of the
; A: |% o3 }0 V1 d' N1 a5 Ynewborn with a regression coefficient of 0.002 (95 % CI* G1 k# k0 s+ ]& L/ Y, K
0.0004 – 0.003; p = 0.01), i.e., there was an increase of 0.2 cm
- ?" `4 E% Q1 D: _2 sin penile length per 100 pg/mL increase in testosterone5 g+ B/ _. O @' _# R8 g& v
level. Moreover, serum testosterone level was significantly8 X y$ h2 m) D: z* U3 `0 a0 }
lower in newborns exposed to EDs (49.50 ± 22.3 pg/mL)
* T. ?4 r- ]% ?9 I, g3 Tthan in the non-exposed group (72.20 ± 31.20 pg/mL;$ g3 Q5 B/ t" Q1 D3 u1 }, v
p < 0.01).6 q# |* V7 d, A" L& I
Table 1 Frequency of genital anomalies according to type of+ X G7 A5 ?7 F, `' C( [) t
exposure to endocrine disruptors.
4 ?& O- G( y1 |Exposure to endocrine
# b3 l5 z' `' N5 L. Xdisruptors7 M. p, G! C- v8 R( K2 z
Prevalence of genital anomalies* L( f( B0 B0 e! F! c' }
Anomalies Total5 E: r3 a8 b& ~+ G
Negative Positive
, @6 o" A) {* cNegative exposure 908 11 919
& Y# f: a& k6 h98.8 % 1.2 % 100.0 %
5 ]! W# a) d' S' FPositive exposure 75 6 81
- Q/ r6 i8 d# R& _7 `92.6 % 7.4 % 100.0 %
" n) P/ w4 Y/ m. a5 j& r& _5 B* RTotal 983 17 10003 P) H% f* t |- L
98.3 % 1.7 % 100.0 %
b# O# o" @% o7 hχ 2 = 25.05, p < 0.0001.+ d Z' O8 b J; K4 m6 P
Over the study period, the birth prevalence of genital
6 x8 E/ [ ]8 m' C3 G0 U! [# [' Tanomalies was 1.8 % , i.e., 18/1000 live birth. Hypospadias; _$ w' n5 g& v. d2 _
accounted for 83.33 % of the cases. Fourteen had glanu-
& {+ q/ h, o# `) n; u: D j0 hlar hypospadias and one had coronal hypospadias. One
) q2 Y; W0 c7 g( B$ j. N Hhad penile torsion and another had penile chordee. Right-
# a* n, j. _6 L, zsided cryptorchidism was present in one newborn.) O5 R t' L% t
Exposure to EDCs8 y$ o6 n+ g# a+ E6 J
Among the whole sample, 81 newborns (8.10 % ) were
$ p u& n6 b: e. c5 cexposed to EDs. The duration of exposure varied from7 G+ A! u5 K+ h7 {2 h' w4 ]
2 to 32 years with a frequency of exposure ranging from
+ s: W2 j! E$ ^# J/ V: gweekly to 2 – 3 months per year. G- C+ s" D, u9 i8 W9 j' t9 @
There was a significantly higher rate of anomalies
9 x. u* o8 @3 c1 O2 `$ [+ Qamong those who were exposed to EDs when compared
0 u/ ^- `, ^( i2 Q7 X/ jto non-exposed newborns (7.4 % vs. 1.2 % ; p < 0.0001), with
% ~* b, s) ?7 i4 n" XTable 2 Type of endocrine disruptor and percentage of anomalies in
4 @4 D' ~% m( v, q: jthe group of neonates exposed to endocrine disruptors (n = 81).: k* r [' D; D- ]$ R* s& b, E7 E2 u
Anomalies Total& [9 O+ q( I0 }2 Q- z! t$ S/ J
Negative Positive
$ k& O6 d; E( {3 [. N) x( E& Z- mChlorinated hydrocarbons (farmers) 19 2 21
$ A1 X5 Q' }5 i W6 L, F90.48 % 9.52 % 100.0 %7 [7 `! ~& G% g( c: g* N
Heavy metals (iron smiths, welders) 30 2 32
) ? e. x1 k1 G/ E3 x93.75 % 6.25 % 100.0 %
: c6 s: a; u+ T0 q RPhthalate esters (house painters) 21 2 235 k( k7 X% t2 e3 g& k* B
91.30 % 8.70 % 100.0 %
+ X2 G3 W4 t3 A1 d7 w3 B* GPhenols (car mechanics) 5 0 56 r8 X5 W9 `. T$ b
100.0 % 0 % 100.0 %
5 `9 \9 z* ~% E( [0 G0 \' r+ }. CTotal 75 6 81
$ C8 C& [! U1 K3 a: S. c92.60 % 7.40 % 100.0 %' I7 K& o$ z4 B" q
Brought to you by | University of California - San Francisco
3 F0 S' c7 @ L1 _' o7 O MAuthenticated
5 H3 T; ^7 `% W$ cDownload Date | 2/18/15 4:26 AM
% T! l% i. b$ u512 El Kholy et al.: Penile length and male genital anomalies
5 E/ o7 m+ Z' G7 L# v$ K0 i+ HDiscussion
: E2 @+ j9 E: E% H2 jPreviously reported penile lengths varied from 2.86 to 3.75 cm
& E1 {3 t* J. m5 _(11 – 16) and depended on ethnicity. In Saudi Arabia (13) ,
/ {& m4 k: o" o$ Y; L' Umean newborn penile length was 3.55 ± 0.57 cm, slightly
+ I1 w( B; ?3 T0 D. p2 @6 qhigher than our mean value. However, the cut-off lower* b( \& w9 a: M: D
limit ( – 2.5 SD) was calculated to be 2.13 cm (vs. 2.5 cm in
0 j+ o3 i8 O5 F: j/ Zour cohort). This emphasizes the importance of establish-
% x) k1 f" \1 a$ b: _% k/ uing the normal values for each country because the normal: A) L4 X% |: t6 t
range could vary markedly. In a multiethnic community,1 ~, H, I$ I8 I9 O6 L/ d
a mean length of – 2.5 SD was used for the definition of
7 M& ]# c) _- ~0 q& Lmicropenis and was 2.6, 2.5, and 2.3 cm for Caucasian,
0 b+ l4 E* ]( |1 SEast-Indian, and Chinese babies, respectively (p < 0.05).- J# U: R8 Z4 b& u: N
This is close to the widely accepted recommendation that" U* Z% k* V- I% ], e
a penile length of 2.4 – 2.5 cm be considered as the lowest# {7 y+ q' q" X# t
limit for the definition of micropenis (8) . The recognition
: A% U& [, K+ Hof micropenis is important, because it might be the only+ q, H, f2 Z& l, \9 {
obvious manifestation of pituitary or hypothalamic hor-8 m6 |" |8 X. r* l! s/ [3 Y$ k
monal deficiencies (17) .# Q: c1 v" v, Y- z- Z
The timing for measurement of testosterone in new-
q& H# e4 |: `) D- S* mborns is highly variable but, generally, during the first 27 L& k# \, j, S
weeks of life (18) . In our study, serum testosterone level8 [+ P( v3 P% \" u* \
was measured in all newborns on day 1 in order to fix a
/ N$ [8 e) D' F6 w2 p8 htime for sample withdrawal in all newborns and, also, to
1 O' _% y8 e% a; xmake sure that all samples were withdrawn before mothers
; j, ^& c4 `& _6 {# {# C( Bwere discharged from the maternity hospital. We found a
: c" f* ^6 _% j# g( Tlinear relationship between penile length and testosterone, X+ m& v5 C& I, i3 k7 O
levels of newborns. Mean penile length was lower in neo-
& R0 d0 n+ r5 U' lnates exposed to EDs compared to the non-exposed group,
) K2 ^* D# r' l$ L2 K; Z1 Jwhich could be related to the lower testosterone levels in }% O8 p0 o; r3 U5 S' y
the exposed group. The etiology of testicular dysgenesis3 u! p/ \6 l: H
syndrome (TDS) is suspected to be related to genetic and/or
$ A1 j( Y* l+ |1 fenvironmental factors, including EDs. Few human studies
' {& [( R- `7 N1 c, K5 Vhave found associations/correlations between EDs, includ-
7 i0 H4 M+ o" Y: qing phthalates, and the different TDS components (18) .
. ~ U2 [, _% @4 T c5 ?/ QSome reports have suggested an increase in hypo-
% _# j/ {9 e/ K; Dspadias rates during the period 1960 – 1990 in European
& ]; |4 L* m0 ?" Z Aand US registries (19 – 23) . There are large geographical
0 L1 O7 \3 C& @9 g0 z1 w# l7 idifferences in reported hypospadias rates, ranging from
" O7 B3 y) \$ ?+ x! }5 N0 A2 S2.0 to 39.7/10,000 live births (23 – 25) . Several explanations
) x$ b; t3 `5 T% Z) z/ W& D4 whave been proposed for the increasing trends and geo-
9 x1 b& }! w- B- v+ `8 V/ c. ggraphical differences. As male sexual differentiation is
% A5 n* v4 {, R2 P" Kcritically dependent on normal androgen concentrations, s* }+ J" _" X E3 t
increased exposure to environmental factors affecting
! g. g* k' S' v( H$ _. k/ Qandrogen homeostasis during fetal life (e.g., EDs with
2 X. r" D$ p' v6 ~" q0 k: Yestrogenic or anti-androgenic properties) may cause" G7 s; E" A& Y4 v
hypospadias (3, 4) .
( ]1 K% Y' A( s* w/ C0 |In Western Australia, the average prevalence of hypo-! ^0 X8 h* R6 e4 n! F+ V
spadias in male infants was 67.7 per 10,000 male births.) l9 Y9 k, N2 p3 b/ {
When applying the EUROCAT definition (24), the average
7 A( J# a" t% v* Hprevalence of hypospadias during 1980 – 2000 was 21.8 per
( n+ K8 \: a! h p5 ^10,000 births and the average annual prevalence increased
^8 o! n% r' F+ Usignificantly over the study period by 2.2 % per year. The% X u* {/ `! S
prevalence of hypospadias in this study was much higher" f4 M: l6 c7 I; K
at 150 per 10,000; by excluding glanular hypospadias, the6 t4 h8 ^8 S6 S- [( Z4 y {& F
prevalence fell sharply to 10 per 10,000 (26) .
& M Q. N. G; L P! a5 oWe found a higher rate of anomalies among newborns
+ ?. q% s6 w, ~, t: Oexposed to EDs when compared to non-exposed newborns
, y5 f* s+ q/ i(7.4 % vs. 1.2 % ); this raises the issue that environmental
$ b4 O5 N; ~# l- I+ ^pollution might play a role in causing these anomalies.' n& i* ~. d& O5 ^, B
Within the last decade, several epidemiologic studies
1 W+ x% k6 `1 ~3 P- Y9 M: }9 Ihave suggested environmental factors as a possible cause, k% n% v( y2 g0 b
for the observed increased incidence of abnormalities in+ x: R& c" l& _" [9 v" _7 E# ]- O+ ]
male reproductive health (27) . Parental environmental/
7 H- ]1 P& l& G: |4 C! ioccupational exposure to EDs before/during pregnancy
+ O! B. {. Y* Zindicates that fetal contamination may be a risk factor for
) c3 C) T% C- ]" \; Fthe development of male external genital malformation
) Z: @1 ?. V+ j E/ h(27 – 29) .2 W0 X5 f- L. P( d
Received October 25, 2012; accepted January 27, 2013; previously% ?7 j' O, I- t+ i! y' ]
published online March 18, 20131 y/ d* w5 f: M7 L+ P1 B0 |' n* R: k
References
, `6 ?3 i* r# H1 Q5 v, ^1. Aaronson IA. Micropenis: medical and surgical implications. J
& h# a1 i! x. a: kUrol 1994;152:4 – 14.
1 C7 G2 f& S! ?2. Gabrich PN, Vasconcelos JS, Dami ã o R, Silva EA. Penile anthro-" I/ m z) E' C5 ~/ Z
pometry in Brazilian children and adolescents. J Pediatr (Rio J)) q4 C( ^' Z+ r- d4 Q
2007;83:441 – 6.3 r$ C! f/ v# z4 I: F, f( x/ T% L
3. Sultan C, Balaguer P, Terouanne B, Georget V, Paris F, et al.+ c, U9 B! y8 \* k* W% h
Environmental xenoestrogens, antiandrogens and disorders of& L# t! l. Z4 l! F
male sexual differentiation. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2001;10:178:# Y1 J E; e2 O" {9 p. ^
99 – 105.
' M# L6 F& i& h: a/ }) ~4. Sharpe RM, Skakkeb æ k NE. Are oestrogens involved in falling' [: c% E B1 x0 b# o3 v
sperm counts and disorders of the male reproductive tract ?) Y" W, L3 ]. }) Y
Lancet 1993;341:1392 – 5.
b8 W) r: v' Q6 }& K: O1 c4 |5. Acerini CL, Hughes IA. Endocrine disrupting chemicals: a new: Z. y3 h1 q! C& r! s
and emerging public health problem ? Arch Dis Child 2006;91:) b$ g# v' ^: _( q, w( u
633 – 41.% a7 o7 ]2 v! N" {( N
6. Joensen UN, J ø rgensen N, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Skakkebaek NE.& w5 a Y8 B1 w ]) E! f6 S
Testicular dysgenesis syndrome and Leydig cell function. Basic) o" j5 g; R, p
Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2008;102:155 – 61.1 @6 j* A9 k/ a& `% Z( ]
7. IEH. Chemicals purported to be endocrine disruptors: a0 G6 W7 F' n9 C, m
compilation of published lists. (Web Report W20), Leicester,# l8 k( O0 J' \ J/ K& `
UK: MRC Institute for Environmental Health, 2005. Accessed on
& e3 v5 I6 u0 e4 a1 EMarch 2005. Available at http://www.le.ac.uk/ieh/.
1 b5 D% y1 @' @7 G& [8. Cheng PK, Chanoine JP. Should the definition of micropenis vary, h; r% V- I# V
according to ethnicity ? Horm Res 2001;55:278 – 81.9 Y! D5 g* F# o5 e8 a% Y
Brought to you by | University of California - San Francisco
' A4 T3 e3 B. J3 r9 P4 \Authenticated6 Z5 \* r3 Z2 ]$ e
Download Date | 2/18/15 4:26 AM7 r, m! Y* n8 N$ H! u' K
El Kholy et al.: Penile length and male genital anomalies 513. Y) w* i _; P" T+ L6 _/ @
21. K ä ll é n B, Bertollini R, Castilla E, Czeizel A, Knudsen LB, et al.
9 s/ Y% S8 m3 r6 XA joint international study on the epidemiology of hypospadias.
s8 k( j+ G$ j" @" ?Acta Paediatr Scand 1986;324(Suppl):1 – 52.! _7 ^. d* F4 A9 V9 x2 K& C
22. Paulozzi LJ, Erickson JD, Jackson RJ. Hypospadias trends in two3 T+ M! V: `; W6 N2 `
US surveillance systems. Pediatrics 1997;100:831 – 4.
! e6 B3 K" a1 Ppenile length in newborn and infants. BJU Int 1999;84 : 1093 – 4.. q4 O& X w8 x7 |
J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2000;13 : 55 – 62.
' g8 N3 ?7 A6 V4 Q+ B" F( B" NVasudevan G, Manivarmane B, Bhat BV, Bhatia BD, Kumar S.
8 S3 H0 d1 }) o: ^7 Y# n! T; IGenital standards for south Indian male newborns. Indian J: G- j- d S$ R
9. Scorer CG. The incidence of incomplete descent of the testicle at
' O, H; `7 G/ M. y ]( n- ebirth. Arch Dis Child 1956;31:198 – 202.
# ]# G* o- V$ r3 k10. Daniel WW. Biostatistics: a foundation for analysis in the health9 I J7 i1 C: K" M- ^8 w, ~
sciences, 6th ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1995.9 R5 n, Y) V& O
11. Flatau E, Josefsberg Z, Reisner SH, Bialik O, Iaron Z. Letter:
; ^( k3 A. X6 x8 bpenile size in the newborn infants. J Pediatr 1975;87:663 – 4.
. L4 ^' F' l% @12. Ozbey H, Temiz A, Salman T. A simple method for measuring
) L3 w$ \/ I5 J9 [13. Al-Herbish AS. Standard penile size for normal full term8 M8 x6 y# o8 V8 T2 q' \
newborns in the Saudi population. Saudi Med J 2002;23:314 – 6.
/ x" v* |2 w6 l3 r14. Lian WB, Lee WR, Ho LY. Penile length of newborns in Singapore.
3 X, N* j% B+ `3 R( C# d15. Pediatr 1995;62:593 – 6.$ w" q9 y8 G' r; E7 ?* ^
16. Boas M, Boisen KA, Virtanen HE, Kaleva M, Suomi AM, et al.1 J2 D3 u- I. G- o" B" ~
Postnatal penile length and growth rate correlate to serum
; g$ L. @/ k6 x5 c! L( Itestosterone levels: a longitudinal study of 1962 normal boys.
1 ?/ M7 \+ i5 s rEur J Endocrinol 2006;154:125 – 9.
) q3 @( l" r* ?: ]& N7 G/ j17. Camurdan AD, Oz MO, Ilhan MN, Camurdan OM, Sahin F,8 s( F8 A7 B; ~0 [$ a+ }8 O
et al. Current stretched penile length: cross-sectional study
# K2 q, c: R {8 b R( Hof 1040 healthy Turkish children aged 0 to 5 years. Urology
/ b& p% s, i+ y% v X4 B) a2007;70:572 – 5.0 Y3 ?8 Z# e" u6 U
18. Bay K, Asklund C, Skakkebaek NE, Andersson AM. Testicular
1 Z2 Y- U$ q4 e& Rdysgenesis syndrome: possible role of endocrine disruptors.
5 [1 V0 G; T4 K) X9 IBest Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;20:77 – 90.4 T) x1 V8 c* X) B" B* |4 `
19. Czeizel A. Increasing trends in congenital malformations of male
/ a% c5 W5 J6 z" B! z$ Gexternal genitalia. Lancet 1985;i:462 – 3.
4 t# g$ O* T. P' H# H9 s r20. Matlai P, Beral V. Trends in congenital malformations of external; q% x- T' S. }! ?( Y
genitalia. Lancet 1985;i:108.
" {) i6 s) X3 l& t" e23. Paulozzi LJ. International trends in rates of hypospadias9 p+ c! U6 m; H' f6 p0 y7 t. \1 }
and cryptorchidism. Environ Health Perspect 1999;107:) e& O- }" C" A( P; ^# i" c8 ?5 w
297 – 302.! T2 N' _6 N# `) E
24. EUROCAT Working Group. EUROCAT report 7. 15 years of0 f) b+ L9 L5 L: @3 v
surveillance of congenital anomalies in Europe 1980 – 1994.
6 k- _: ~" ?& C. [; @ b {Brussels, Belgium: Scientific Institute of Public Health-Louis$ T8 H2 y' h5 \6 R# ]! s. L- ^9 L
Pasteur, 1997.- _2 ? Z1 x1 j1 |
25. Toppari J, Kaleva M, Virtanen HE. Trends in the incidence/ G' m; j3 x$ e- }
of cryptorchidism and hypospadias, and methodological9 E3 z/ b2 E$ w: Q. j3 @
limitations of registry-based data. Hum Reprod Update
% T2 ^. ~7 h5 Y* N2001;7:282 – 6.
6 L, d' N+ R* V% S, o# ~6 s26. Nassar N, Bower C, Barker A. Increasing prevalence of. C! ~. T' Z7 S
hypospadias in Western Australia, 1980 – 2000. Arch Dis Child: c) C3 x- w q* C/ F; ~" r1 p( f7 W; R3 y
2007;92:580 – 4.
$ ~9 q9 @+ y6 t( j; ]1 ^27. Wang MH, Baskin LS. Endocrine disruptors, genital
- I" b3 b( p0 a+ @) Tdevelopment, and hypospadias. J Androl 2008;29:499 – 505.# `- t0 A. M: Z, o$ Y2 \1 M
28. Morales-Su á rez-Varela MM, Toft GV, Jensen MS, Ramlau-Hansen
( e# Q% Y9 R1 e( qC, Linda Kaerlev L, et al. Parental occupational exposure to
- w r& U* B$ Z0 D6 V5 ?$ L3 `. Q9 vendocrine disrupting chemicals and male genital malfor-
" Y u5 p, t/ C( hmations: a study in the Danish National Birth Cohort Study.
8 p) p+ o1 Y0 R! d; AEnviron Health 2011;10:3.
0 e' P$ V4 z" t5 e29. Gaspari L, Sampaio DR, Paris F, Audran F, Orsini M, et al. High
6 a# n! H4 a6 _7 K5 [' Uprevalence of micropenis in 2710 male newborns from an
: F% L1 s! R D4 f" E" Bintensive-use pesticide area of Northeastern Brazil. Int J Androl% a% Z2 D3 c8 {
2012;35:253 – 64. |
|