- 註冊時間
- 2023-5-6
- 精華
- 在線時間
- 小時
- 米币
-
- 最後登錄
- 1970-1-1
累計簽到:5 天 連續簽到:1 天
|
Sexual Precocity in a 16-Month-Old" m" X3 f$ g6 v \
Boy Induced by Indirect Topical
( x! f' m" r1 l% o# B; E% k7 ~5 sExposure to Testosterone
* `3 b) Q# |2 l |2 G2 H2 KSamar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,1 Tracy Ricke, MD,2
! F' P' K. U- K1 sand Kenneth R. Rettig, MD15 c( h1 w' Y6 O
Clinical Pediatrics
' r4 a. f, M4 U2 ^: T& f' }Volume 46 Number 6
1 l' I2 m, A0 [" C+ z q/ WJuly 2007 540-5430 c d! l% b7 u$ ^2 W
© 2007 Sage Publications
0 I& K/ D6 r! {; M10.1177/0009922806296651
2 h8 Y5 ^% H* i. h+ x* \# W9 t9 Shttp://clp.sagepub.com
8 `: j) h0 P$ W! P7 ~' h6 g0 Y/ {hosted at
m, v" j) W! r) X- B: Rhttp://online.sagepub.com6 O) O* v3 X4 Q* s, I/ j
Precocious puberty in boys, central or peripheral,
6 D) b5 Q$ T" m0 N8 j9 ~; _is a significant concern for physicians. Central; ?; ~' q/ ~6 C3 F8 q$ P% y
precocious puberty (CPP), which is mediated
6 P" c, q1 h; l$ F% p5 r. |% hthrough the hypothalamic pituitary gonadal axis, has1 M4 \; b" r h
a higher incidence of organic central nervous system* r/ T2 q: f) V) ?
lesions in boys.1,2 Virilization in boys, as manifested2 m9 K- k& H+ i6 R8 \! j k
by enlargement of the penis, development of pubic
9 ^9 Q/ h/ j6 u& g: Khair, and facial acne without enlargement of testi-# n! A ]9 S$ a6 O' u
cles, suggests peripheral or pseudopuberty.1-3 We
0 j' ^" U. g- j% D( `% Preport a 16-month-old boy who presented with the5 s' r* d. Q0 u) u
enlargement of the phallus and pubic hair develop-8 P" i& x) R- d( |- i
ment without testicular enlargement, which was due
, q3 W( e. s9 L" Uto the unintentional exposure to androgen gel used by) B+ G4 f3 Z2 _' S- p8 g
the father. The family initially concealed this infor-
" @! @7 \ Y6 K0 r% N6 N6 Ymation, resulting in an extensive work-up for this
" Z% d! } ]; ]8 Bchild. Given the widespread and easy availability of* D/ I4 }' i* P5 s/ {
testosterone gel and cream, we believe this is proba-( P8 D( T( O3 j q! b
bly more common than the rare case report in the. j+ S0 V8 y q" W- W
literature.4# _; o0 H, W4 ?, j
Patient Report
8 _! V# ^- G& U5 D1 GA 16-month-old white child was referred to the, e5 T2 O3 O9 @+ A, T1 d2 `* |. t
endocrine clinic by his pediatrician with the concern
% E4 k3 R* Z) O1 S/ ^5 Aof early sexual development. His mother noticed% ^+ w( S2 |4 ?/ E; m
light colored pubic hair development when he was. U {# X" F9 u2 F
From the 1Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, 2University of1 P6 w$ M7 m( W8 O
South Alabama Medical Center, Mobile, Alabama.
$ f7 g. E' d1 _( J+ kAddress correspondence to: Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,- H" J, K2 c+ D8 Q2 x( `
Professor of Pediatrics, University of South Alabama, College of& y: S4 p( a+ [% B
Medicine, 2451 Fillingim St. Mastin 212, Mobile, AL 36617-2297;
1 {3 m! m, F2 O3 p/ C9 ee-mail: [email protected].2 Z% |% Z' v! [$ N2 `0 |0 B
about 6 to 7 months old, which progressively became. d, Q9 m+ Z8 V5 T4 ~' E7 e9 @
darker. She was also concerned about the enlarge-! v: r* t9 |8 q
ment of his penis and frequent erections. The child2 W5 ^ Q) j* T, O
was the product of a full-term normal delivery, with( [% {- w8 W O3 n, i7 e1 W
a birth weight of 7 lb 14 oz, and birth length of! E/ z$ L W0 S7 F* S
20 inches. He was breast-fed throughout the first year
% b( I( H8 f3 p- j6 T! [of life and was still receiving breast milk along with+ U+ v2 p- s# R$ A
solid food. He had no hospitalizations or surgery,
5 A( y+ m. @( {: y: [$ S8 a, Gand his psychosocial and psychomotor development
4 X) V: V$ k8 M' s/ ~& I. X8 Qwas age appropriate.
; G' ~9 F1 e! `. VThe family history was remarkable for the father,* z0 W# \8 m# h) ?' g
who was diagnosed with hypothyroidism at age 16,
9 _" o5 i; d6 g8 Z, P# G8 F5 E5 |which was treated with thyroxine. The father’s
7 U# K7 q/ {; e% \- z$ V% zheight was 6 feet, and he went through a somewhat
. C% M+ y" u; F$ l, Iearly puberty and had stopped growing by age 14.
9 ?) W2 e! j2 z* x' EThe father denied taking any other medication. The1 z& |% i5 i" I) g, A o
child’s mother was in good health. Her menarche- r- R; m \8 `7 i' j# y4 Z
was at 11 years of age, and her height was at 5 feet- N+ ]7 R' p4 Q. u
5 inches. There was no other family history of pre-
. |" _$ _3 R) G* [$ c% jcocious sexual development in the first-degree rela-) {" H3 Z( K7 X/ F) D" r0 K2 n
tives. There were no siblings.
! I* }. g3 D2 W2 S. IPhysical Examination
O3 J5 a. g i+ J3 j1 wThe physical examination revealed a very active,2 X: z$ G, r# m% r% c
playful, and healthy boy. The vital signs documented3 X8 ^ t3 R9 a4 I
a blood pressure of 85/50 mm Hg, his length was9 N6 Z1 j# { J1 h
90 cm (>97th percentile), and his weight was 14.4 kg) C. p# s1 L9 V, w4 V, F
(also >97th percentile). The observed yearly growth: F2 U7 K( Z, t+ _1 N
velocity was 30 cm (12 inches). The examination of
* I9 }. T C! b( B9 `/ dthe neck revealed no thyroid enlargement.8 t0 P. W W5 w4 o
The genitourinary examination was remarkable for5 n% u$ n) C+ v
enlargement of the penis, with a stretched length of
8 {% p$ l8 g$ w. n+ |& K( I8 cm and a width of 2 cm. The glans penis was very well |' }4 Q8 y8 t+ x1 z
developed. The pubic hair was Tanner II, mostly around7 Q& z2 L7 f7 |9 M7 p" ]7 R
540$ M- F$ B e, Z+ y c% ^6 k
at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from
* V% H/ e+ A9 V+ y* L z1 h2 x( Jthe base of the phallus and was dark and curled. The3 z1 k" r" i3 D0 O% o6 m" [+ G) t
testicular volume was prepubertal at 2 mL each.
6 F) Y5 X- U& b9 w% t. gThe skin was moist and smooth and somewhat( W) ?# k- I% Y+ J0 [+ M' u
oily. No axillary hair was noted. There were no
/ I: v; N5 ], T, Aabnormal skin pigmentations or café-au-lait spots.0 f8 G W: y: H
Neurologic evaluation showed deep tendon reflex 2+. g- E! i: N R1 _, a
bilateral and symmetrical. There was no suggestion
/ Q( B) r: \# C1 Qof papilledema.
: \/ e% ^; p4 `Laboratory Evaluation
* m( S/ Q: ~2 p3 u! C" HThe bone age was consistent with 28 months by+ I2 n4 Q* O2 R# p3 p3 N
using the standard of Greulich and Pyle at a chrono-. T, P1 D! A+ B ?, c/ w% i- Q8 S8 n
logic age of 16 months (advanced).5 Chromosomal( s* P! B; L, A4 q
karyotype was 46XY. The thyroid function test* }! c4 g6 h3 I2 I" v1 D; w
showed a free T4 of 1.69 ng/dL, and thyroid stimu-) [( ~3 z+ X+ {" r8 s) q
lating hormone level was 1.3 µIU/mL (both normal).
# ? H* b( A* m% G/ f! u5 GThe concentrations of serum electrolytes, blood
5 l* ]" X+ r8 Burea nitrogen, creatinine, and calcium all were3 g g$ |; T E1 Z# f, C& U
within normal range for his age. The concentration" A3 V( j8 e i' `0 ?/ O
of serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone was 16 ng/dL
- b5 d Y q/ P7 l, E" T/ @, b(normal, 3 to 90 ng/dL), androstenedione was 20, P; D( V2 W& O$ p8 } w1 X
ng/dL (normal, 18 to 80 ng/dL), dehydroepiandros-
7 S ~$ T6 F! _5 q1 g7 H( kterone was 38 ng/dL (normal, 50 to 760 ng/dL),
3 V. f4 u- ], Vdesoxycorticosterone was 4.3 ng/dL (normal, 7 to
# q3 ^; U6 I( R) ^! I4 L49ng/dL), 11-desoxycortisol (specific compound S)
- v/ N+ p! c: h3 {9 x% Ewas 43 ng/dL (normal, 10 to 156 ng/dL), serum cor-+ P; f: f1 e$ E5 |
tisol was 7.6 µg/dL (normal, 2.8 to 23 µg/dL), total% {! I9 y2 O$ U. F3 f) T6 j
testosterone was 60 ng/dL (normal <3 to 10 ng/dL),
2 ?% d+ }( L- b y+ ~and β-human chorionic gonadotropin was less than
s8 ?8 B, W: B6 @0 k( C5 mIU/mL (normal <5 mIU/mL). Serum follicular
( n6 A5 y4 N/ s! bstimulating hormone and leuteinizing hormone% S* v- D# t3 J1 l$ H
concentrations were less than 0.05 mIU/mL
; E! K) I9 Y$ Q5 N( l' Q5 e(prepubertal).& ?# {5 R' Y3 E1 F/ _6 Z9 v3 S
The parents were notified about the laboratory: H& o( e1 Q9 \' @
results and were informed that all of the tests were
4 F; b2 E: v3 l: s/ p& Qnormal except the testosterone level was high. The
7 j* m3 a) t$ W# K* x9 Efollow-up visit was arranged within a few weeks to* J, r. n4 K( ~4 `: L! e. ]. V2 v
obtain testicular and abdominal sonograms; how-9 L9 A6 x# C7 @: F+ w: q) D
ever, the family did not return for 4 months.
- \# x/ ^5 o- Q# HPhysical examination at this time revealed that the
8 n* X8 c% v; l7 Z, @child had grown 2.5 cm in 4 months and had gained
$ z( J' {! u0 P2 \* m, m2 kg of weight. Physical examination remained' C( f0 |" i- Y' I
unchanged. Surprisingly, the pubic hair almost com-1 s2 q, ]6 j: C5 {6 A2 w
pletely disappeared except for a few vellous hairs at
3 ` @7 t: e9 g: Pthe base of the phallus. Testicular volume was still 25 B6 n; ]+ M( d$ K6 ~
mL, and the size of the penis remained unchanged.
# ]9 u9 R! M, u FThe mother also said that the boy was no longer hav-2 C: b% r& X k1 _
ing frequent erections." n% W& |% h. w
Both parents were again questioned about use of9 r$ s2 k- u0 M3 G* ?
any ointment/creams that they may have applied to
/ {4 x- v- h" d3 V, J0 R; athe child’s skin. This time the father admitted the U4 \: x1 Y. i+ p9 c" F" h
Topical Testosterone Exposure / Bhowmick et al 5418 l& Y0 I7 }5 z4 b9 s
use of testosterone gel twice daily that he was apply-% i) e: j8 `" r( |
ing over his own shoulders, chest, and back area for5 D) j9 i. O! `& O+ n9 k5 `
a year. The father also revealed he was embarrassed) D+ |3 B; X/ F- V" l( q8 Z
to disclose that he was using a testosterone gel pre-
9 ~+ M" ]4 {$ K2 M M+ oscribed by his family physician for decreased libido
* N, w0 y# g* N: E7 V E+ V8 ssecondary to depression.! P3 s' F2 x# V# {/ R
The child slept in the same bed with parents.
1 m1 v9 B* }9 l! SThe father would hug the baby and hold him on his
+ j$ j: R# u. @6 G, y+ Zchest for a considerable period of time, causing sig-6 K7 x$ c2 y, W6 A. A
nificant bare skin contact between baby and father.- u* E4 r$ K9 A0 {
The father also admitted that after the phone call,* h+ w) v! |. k( d# u7 g& I
when he learned the testosterone level in the baby( ?/ e) N/ p7 Y- X: t
was high, he then read the product information$ ?- F' }3 g) g. a) p# e5 s6 r
packet and concluded that it was most likely the rea-: v8 ]! t& M2 |0 ]' U" C5 u( c/ B5 A9 S
son for the child’s virilization. At that time, they
6 L! y% D6 z( n. d* O: }# _! Ddecided to put the baby in a separate bed, and the h4 S1 m+ m3 \1 ]+ E
father was not hugging him with bare skin and had; h! i) a3 l& M, R- _
been using protective clothing. A repeat testosterone
8 Y) l; b5 ]0 a3 f6 dtest was ordered, but the family did not go to the
" I. c& N9 U) U: Flaboratory to obtain the test.
7 z6 @9 F" A6 KDiscussion
* J, q* `* w& r. `Precocious puberty in boys is defined as secondary
4 B. ^+ p1 R! i5 f+ Ssexual development before 9 years of age.1,4; b- k* I. Z* V5 o$ _, k* C
Precocious puberty is termed as central (true) when5 W% A- V: z& I' M& z/ b' |0 X! c
it is caused by the premature activation of hypo-
$ r# r9 K/ Q7 B" _thalamic pituitary gonadal axis. CPP is more com-
5 k& i V! R1 qmon in girls than in boys.1,3 Most boys with CPP3 o! C! L, U; T, O& o) n. x: t
may have a central nervous system lesion that is; \4 _$ V O% w+ C5 X# B4 j
responsible for the early activation of the hypothal-
; ?6 T g, k9 hamic pituitary gonadal axis.1-3 Thus, greater empha-
3 W: |% _/ ]9 f! n" Fsis has been given to neuroradiologic imaging in
( G' x$ e# m$ _) S: Fboys with precocious puberty. In addition to viril-
4 N% p/ t& e1 Q& R1 z" B6 r; Fization, the clinical hallmark of CPP is the symmet-
" G* u0 ^! c1 u3 P* V% Erical testicular growth secondary to stimulation by- }* R& j( R5 U
gonadotropins.1,3/ p: P6 Y+ F& g) ]% l+ F/ o
Gonadotropin-independent peripheral preco-
0 m s E- w: q$ }, wcious puberty in boys also results from inappropriate" _' t: Y5 l# u v- T1 @0 c
androgenic stimulation from either endogenous or: t \5 R. D( g" z1 g, }
exogenous sources, nonpituitary gonadotropin stim-
& w3 n! a4 @, f; g) N4 Xulation, and rare activating mutations.3 Virilizing
3 i: p1 O' {% @, c! pcongenital adrenal hyperplasia producing excessive
/ ^3 o$ u4 ?, T0 n+ Kadrenal androgens is a common cause of precocious; n. O( R0 z6 T# c+ U
puberty in boys.3,4
- q7 `; J; T+ O* q; @9 eThe most common form of congenital adrenal. ~- N6 v! L, N7 W
hyperplasia is the 21-hydroxylase enzyme deficiency.
# k. W$ d u% \6 R' `The 11-β hydroxylase deficiency may also result in
' B% S; K8 j/ {7 Rexcessive adrenal androgen production, and rarely,( Z/ }4 L! W1 |
an adrenal tumor may also cause adrenal androgen
& N. O5 u- Z! f" j% P" hexcess.1,3
( ]. B `1 f F+ Oat University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from; D3 s5 R M1 `3 t
542 Clinical Pediatrics / Vol. 46, No. 6, July 2007
0 u7 R, v u- C( n* |! h7 W6 uA unique entity of male-limited gonadotropin-+ X5 e! i$ q& L7 A2 h4 @' v0 P
independent precocious puberty, which is also known* f; c+ Y, m+ \! J9 k* r
as testotoxicosis, may cause precocious puberty at a) w, k* O' ?9 R+ y9 I3 W
very young age. The physical findings in these boys2 `7 y$ l1 ]: Q' @! {/ v& J
with this disorder are full pubertal development,. k; @7 F0 F. P$ {) ]# z6 l
including bilateral testicular growth, similar to boys
/ N! `( _* e( W" v8 ]2 b# \# Iwith CPP. The gonadotropin levels in this disorder
4 \+ \3 o9 ?5 B4 W, F Sare suppressed to prepubertal levels and do not show6 C5 }3 D, S, g$ B: y
pubertal response of gonadotropin after gonadotropin-
; Q' m4 D+ J8 Y: ]+ m* E/ t$ m: b6 freleasing hormone stimulation. This is a sex-linked) j! a& ^1 D% Q" J v5 ` j
autosomal dominant disorder that affects only$ C. c8 }" \( @; E3 K
males; therefore, other male members of the family
& |. B/ H. m; s2 Y! Wmay have similar precocious puberty.3
3 R4 [, Q- y! bIn our patient, physical examination was incon-
$ w! b: q) T+ |! L& Q0 W7 gsistent with true precocious puberty since his testi-9 t: j6 {; Z0 m* Q8 @+ |& l4 z
cles were prepubertal in size. However, testotoxicosis( j) x$ Z( d- e5 Q+ R$ c. S
was in the differential diagnosis because his father4 y) L$ D8 b6 R/ W
started puberty somewhat early, and occasionally,+ k+ {5 V% e: w' w. g! U
testicular enlargement is not that evident in the# h9 d1 E/ z& S- ~: }
beginning of this process.1 In the absence of a neg-7 V2 M2 G' A; M
ative initial history of androgen exposure, our8 ?. S( ?% q- M+ h c7 j
biggest concern was virilizing adrenal hyperplasia,& q! U; v1 r; V' a
either 21-hydroxylase deficiency or 11-β hydroxylase
2 q& y9 o/ N. S+ o* L7 _8 udeficiency. Those diagnoses were excluded by find-
8 }# Z8 H8 V9 K3 K( h1 r! {ing the normal level of adrenal steroids.2 Q+ \: U. E/ w, d8 o8 ]& r2 O
The diagnosis of exogenous androgens was strongly& T' P, `# D3 R4 f, [* i+ e
suspected in a follow-up visit after 4 months because: k+ A, D/ W- R* [9 b+ ^: @
the physical examination revealed the complete disap-
5 P' z( i' p0 }2 i. |pearance of pubic hair, normal growth velocity, and' D9 z: }; j, O7 Y/ o" R$ P
decreased erections. The father admitted using a testos-
" L( n" R$ H; w& D8 o! Fterone gel, which he concealed at first visit. He was
5 z7 y1 D: N1 `; R* R: Z2 X6 ]: fusing it rather frequently, twice a day. The Physicians’
7 @: j& ~7 C" j- t* f aDesk Reference, or package insert of this product, gel or
8 O f8 k4 b w6 h0 Z6 G) h! Ycream, cautions about dermal testosterone transfer to
% N7 F) W8 x: @- T/ y! aunprotected females through direct skin exposure.
# T7 M0 q" Q5 t; w0 kSerum testosterone level was found to be 2 times the9 b( }6 I) \9 J3 y. T+ A
baseline value in those females who were exposed to n A. f0 R2 v1 z
even 15 minutes of direct skin contact with their male
0 t* U l: f4 J7 [- `+ }1 @& zpartners.6 However, when a shirt covered the applica-
2 x% a/ L5 R0 L. z y8 ^3 [$ \* ztion site, this testosterone transfer was prevented.
( k9 ?+ `3 C- e# F9 t6 r- c; `7 |Our patient’s testosterone level was 60 ng/mL,
# M- X3 R! E5 z7 Ewhich was clearly high. Some studies suggest that
# q: n9 D( V( K2 x! fdermal conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestos-, U" o5 `$ I% W! j6 n# z- {6 z
terone, which is a more potent metabolite, is more
0 m6 M# \" ] Y; S) G dactive in young children exposed to testosterone! |1 F4 |8 \6 h8 N
exogenously7; however, we did not measure a dihy-7 ]" c4 w% j0 t
drotestosterone level in our patient. In addition to3 c; j; E+ O, t/ x# l" j- [7 M
virilization, exposure to exogenous testosterone in
3 @* Z, N- W2 e* T8 F& @2 {children results in an increase in growth velocity and
. c$ u, h7 j( r* G/ ?8 l ^advanced bone age, as seen in our patient.% m9 u; W$ _) p- I6 h
The long-term effect of androgen exposure during8 X: P. I2 O" Z) U
early childhood on pubertal development and final6 p) m4 I" S8 G% B7 W/ r
adult height are not fully known and always remain
9 a; n' m. _& p; d* Oa concern. Children treated with short-term testos-) Z$ @' Y1 G5 Z/ Q
terone injection or topical androgen may exhibit some" _# x# L8 }" [
acceleration of the skeletal maturation; however, after3 [# x2 Y- ^ ~; h/ h$ w; C$ z s
cessation of treatment, the rate of bone maturation, S% }( H7 V% Y
decelerates and gradually returns to normal.8,9
8 U; M# a2 E* A8 C9 E% o& e7 D4 JThere are conflicting reports and controversy% m% m8 Z i+ D+ D v
over the effect of early androgen exposure on adult
9 t" F0 N' A3 o' L Y* c' openile length.10,11 Some reports suggest subnormal
; _% r( l; Z2 M% v% m* }/ Iadult penile length, apparently because of downreg-5 {/ F% l% R i* g0 N9 X
ulation of androgen receptor number.10,12 However," s5 |( Y4 V1 ?3 w# N! N
Sutherland et al13 did not find a correlation between4 _) z) o1 k' u/ {; f
childhood testosterone exposure and reduced adult, n+ W3 @4 r7 l9 B4 R* Q g/ Q
penile length in clinical studies." `* _' j" C. W/ m x
Nonetheless, we do not believe our patient is4 v* X/ O3 U8 O# e' m9 n
going to experience any of the untoward effects from
4 V' l( H, O5 P5 d5 stestosterone exposure as mentioned earlier because
2 k2 t: g, g( K: X8 o+ u7 o7 }. y! \the exposure was not for a prolonged period of time.! O' v" m# K2 m" \$ a# }
Although the bone age was advanced at the time of0 g9 Q9 G/ D7 Y: j9 O) ?
diagnosis, the child had a normal growth velocity at! `, U" O( A9 @5 r$ U% _
the follow-up visit. It is hoped that his final adult
5 A% k, X' C. dheight will not be affected.
6 E2 {# q" @- x$ TAlthough rarely reported, the widespread avail-. _' H, r0 b) d Y7 Q8 N' ^
ability of androgen products in our society may4 Z2 D8 Z" I! T' q: x- |) O6 r
indeed cause more virilization in male or female6 V: X' X1 H1 _- D+ c/ [) t
children than one would realize. Exposure to andro-
0 V, G) g: q; p! agen products must be considered and specific ques-' |9 S& v; V3 O, U
tioning about the use of a testosterone product or
( R* r2 n& H- n' n% x9 J$ z3 Vgel should be asked of the family members during
2 T. U$ V! H Z' }0 d9 @the evaluation of any children who present with vir-
5 R8 i. q, A: }& ?2 {' pilization or peripheral precocious puberty. The diag-
8 Z6 A) ?- x" A unosis can be established by just a few tests and by. f1 [. j& X# q4 U9 V5 }9 ?
appropriate history. The inability to obtain such a
! B- S- w, h. W& m' g0 C t5 Bhistory, or failure to ask the specific questions, may/ {" L. c! |) L0 X! s* u2 C" T5 H: v$ ]
result in extensive, unnecessary, and expensive5 ?( E/ E" M+ H' S0 r" U
investigation. The primary care physician should be
, }9 x2 v& p w2 l" ~aware of this fact, because most of these children
/ D) u# D, [6 z. U0 z% fmay initially present in their practice. The Physicians’" z7 M( Y; A6 v. b' ]/ Q# b
Desk Reference and package insert should also put a
% J" |) v+ |6 P, L ]warning about the virilizing effect on a male or
|+ T& E( G, \, O% w) x3 Q Cfemale child who might come in contact with some-1 ~5 [, l' l5 I* M$ D( l; x* d
one using any of these products.6 ]+ T& t% c! k! w! S5 {
References( E0 c& n' g6 u/ g" @' V! v- e$ H
1. Styne DM. The testes: disorder of sexual differentiation
) [% l9 U$ U+ l! |7 ~( o5 J- vand puberty in the male. In: Sperling MA, ed. Pediatric
" ]5 p; a8 @4 B h5 qEndocrinology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders;% L) w' C' A; P6 ^; @& |
2002: 565-628.
9 K' U. x) I4 w/ c% p2. Rivarola M, Belgorosky A, Mendilaharzu H, et al. Precocious+ N* ~0 ^& F; q: a' d! K- M, ]
puberty in children with tumours of the suprasellar pineal |
|